Unable to sleep at night, he fakes a variety of medical and mental health conditions so he can join support groups for sufferers of testicular cancer or sickle cell anaemia, finding some comfort and release in the physical and emotional pain of others. More like this - Is this the greatest romcom ever? However, he still has a void in his soul — until he meets Tyler Durden.
Charming, beautiful, ripped and totally off-the-grid. Tyler is on a one-man revenge mission against the world, relieving himself in the soup in fancy restaurant kitchens and turning human fat stolen from liposuction clinics into soap — which he then sells back to the rich women it came from in the first place. And he demonstrates that the only way for men to really feel anything is to beat the living hell out of each other in underground fight clubs. Fight Club the movie is brutal, sexy, violent, stylish and, superficially at least, has a powerful message: the things we own end up owning us.
But is that the message at all, in fact? Is it really an anti-consumerist statement, or something else entirely? Perhaps its ambiguity was one of the things that made it a hard sell. For while it now regularly makes the lists of the best movies of the s, if not of all time, it fared less well on its autumn release. After a splashy premiere at the Venice film festival, which set the industry abuzz, it failed to set fire at the box office and critics were extremely divided.
However, the renowned reviewer Roger Ebert hated it. It is this element that is perhaps most pertinent — and, many would argue, misunderstood — two decades on. The big twist that Bradshaw refers to is, of course, that The Narrator and Tyler Durden are one and the same.
The first has created the second as an avatar who can say and do all the things he is too scared to. The turning point for The Narrator comes when he realises that Tyler — before he knows they are one and the same — is directing the energy from the Fight Clubs into something very different: militia group Project Mayhem.
Tyler has turned the men who have found both a release and a purpose from knocking hell out of each other into a private army, with plans to launch a devastating terrorist attack. The only other people who liked it were guys, but the more I talked to them about it, the more it seemed like we were watching two totally different movies.
They thought the story was about how men should be able to take out their aggression however and whenever they want. The problem in their logic comes when they want to strip away the consumerist programming Fight Club is so against, and replace it with more programming in the form of old-fashioned gender roles, destructive caricatures of masculinity, and patriarchal privilege. Instead of consumerist culture, MRA Fight Club fanboys want power, silent women, and—wait for it—the American Dream, just by another name.
That kind of ethos is completely against the point of Fight Club , which recognizes that the patriarchy hurts men as well as the rest of us. The patriarchal establishments that make up our country also created the American Dream; they told us what we should want and gave us the often quite rigged rules of how to get it. Be who you are, whether that looks like traditional masculinity or not. If this story was happening today, Project Mayhem would be rounding up incels and turning them into anti-capitalist freedom fighters, men who try to destroy the patriarchy instead of bending to its will and lining its pockets.
Fuck the rules. Created by Grove Atlantic and Electric Literature. By Rebecca Renner. She is working on a novel. Close to the Lithub Daily Thank you for subscribing! Just Because You're Paranoid By the time the Narrator's insomnia returned, Tyler had already firmly established himself in the world behind the Narrator's back.
Throughout the story, Tyler attempts to forcefully guide the Narrator to enlightenment by encouraging him to hit bottom. He wanted to gradually destroy the Narrator's empty, societally-programmed self. If he had succeeded, there would have no longer been any distinction between the Narrator and Tyler, and the split "Tyler Durden" persona wouldn't have been needed anymore.
But by the end of the story, Tyler realized that he failed. The Narrator remained strongly opposed to Tyler's goals, and viewed Tyler's attempt to free him self as a hostile takeover of his mind. He never reached the full understanding that Tyler Durden was his real personality. The personality he percieved as "himself" was actually the fake, having been programmed into his head by society. At the end of the story, the Narrator appears to kill Tyler by shooting himself through the face.
This apparently works because it means the Narrator has finally hit bottom, momentarily becoming fully free and in control. This allows his choice to be rid of Tyler rather than becoming him to take full effect. Even so, a split-second shot of a penis at the end suggests that Tyler is still very much alive. Which it turns out he is, per Fight Club 2. Tyler Durden set forth to dissolve societal programming, attack consumerism, and upset the established social order.
His ideals seem to combine elements of Neo-Luddism, Anarcho-Primitivism, Buddhism, and esoteric spirituality such as G. Gurdjieff's Fourth Way , with a strong anti-consumerism theme throughout.
0コメント