This can even evolve into Phase 2 or 3 of the project in which you start over with Project Phase 1 Scoping. The position of software architect is demanding, if we take into account that there is social interaction, it requires a good team spirit and understanding for others, good technical background and willingness to constantly learn new things.
The main obstacles for a person to run for the position of software architect would, in my opinion , be the following:. Josip is a Software Architect at FarShore. Besides work, his points of interest are crypto eco-system, intra-day trading and volleyball.
Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue, we will assume that you agree to our Privacy Policy. Lost your password? Share Share. Software Architect What is the definition of Software Architect?
Current position I am currently in the position of a software architect. I participate as a link that connects the development team, the client and the product. In daily or weekly briefing, I try to bring the project issues and the current state of the product closer to the client. This helps us all make good and timely decisions. This item sometimes includes writing code, pseudocode, auxiliary diagrams, and giving exact examples Project phases As I have already gone through a number of projects, I have internally put together the stages of each project regardless of the product development method.
Fig 2. Illustrational mockups. Josip Vojak. Did you find this article interesting? Share it on Social Media :. Previous Post. Next article. Pros and Cons of Virtual Meetings. Leave a reply Cancel reply Social connect:. You may also like. More in Farshore.
Posts List. Dashfire: Three Steps to Sustainability. Software Development. Online Marketing. Product Development. Social Media. Join our newsletter! Enter your email to receive our newsletter. Follow Us. This website uses cookies We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Social connect:. Remember Me. They often act as a designer, developer and communicator.
Responsibilities include:. Researching and evaluating technical standards and tools for a project and determining which ones are the optimal choice. Communicating business requirements, criteria and needs to software development teams. Distributing development tasks to a team of software engineers.
Quality assurance testing segments of project code and checking for errors. Writing sections of code as part of development in a project. Most software architects are full-time salaried employees, though some freelance or work contract positions. The salary for a software architect will vary based on regional factors, qualifications and certifications and the size of the development team. Software architects have years of training and experience in software development and design.
Some earn certifications to widen their job search and increase their earning potential. However, software architect positions favor training and experience over a degree, and it is possible to get a software architect position with no degree at all. As a general guideline, software architects usually receive training in:. Software architects could receive training in these topics on the job with their company, or off the job at seminars and conferences.
Many software architects attend seminars and conferences to keep up to date with a continually changing technological industry. There are hundreds of certifications that a software architect may obtain. Which certifications a software architect will need will vary depending on the development team and the projects the software architect will oversee.
Here are two commonly useful certifications a software architect may seek:. As a software architect, you will typically work full time in an office environment with your development team. You may conduct some of your work remotely or interface with other developers as they work off-site. Software architects typically work full time on weekdays and sometimes extra hours in the evenings or over the weekend to meet timeline goals with projects. You should be able to sit in front of a computer for extended periods of time.
You can follow these general steps to become a software architect:. The most important characteristic of an architect is the ability to solve problems. The wider and deeper the range of these problems, the more senior the architect in terms of skill—not necessarily years. But regardless of their focus, the principle task of an architect is to determine a good solution to a problem.
The output of an architect is a description or roadmap saying how to solve a problem. Instead, they want to jump immediately into solving it. To deliver a good solution, an architect must first holistically understand the problem. Problems always have business impact, although frequently they are positioned as purely technical problems.
An architect needs to understand the context of the problem they are solving before they can provide a good solution. Since the non-technical side of the company may have little insight into the business impact of a technical decision, it falls to the architect to assess and communicate these impacts in order to choose a good solution. Not every good architecture is novel.
In fact, a solid, tried-and-true solution to a standard, recurring technical problem is nearly always better overall in terms of development and maintenance costs. This is because the combination of the current situation and constraints, the business requirements, and the technology options available to us at any given moment in time form a large and evolving set.
In fact, the number of variables is large enough that their values are rarely the same twice. This gives ample room—and need—for creativity, even when you are not setting out with a goal to be novel.
Architects within established companies have the additional challenge of being thoroughly familiar with their existing system s. This can naturally incline them toward an evolutionary approach. In their case, the need for creativity often involves the ability to see their current business with fresh eyes; in particular, applying novel techniques to current problems and opportunities, in cases where these approaches provide genuine business or technical value. A primary hallmark of a software architect is their ability to make a decision about which solution is the best fit for a specific business or technical problem even if that recommendation is ultimately not accepted.
Considering the cost, feasibility, and team preferences and skillsets of a given choice is indeed an architectural function — and can be a good way of deciding between alternatives when they are comparable technically. Where executives get into trouble as architectural decision-makers is when they choose or introduce a technology that is not technically suitable to the solution of the problem, or that is not nearly as good as the architect-recommended options.
For example, I once witnessed an executive override the recommendations of his architects and choose a totally inappropriate technology because he had already paid a lot of money for it. This executive did not appreciate the fact that the success of his project required him to play an architectural role, not a political or managerial one, when making this technology decision.
The implementation of his program suffered accordingly as the team tried to work around the limits of an unsuitable technology. While architects play a key and often pivotal role in software development, there are many other essential roles to software development.
Here are some of the other roles who are often labeled as architects but who, in my opinion, often perform non-architect roles. This person surveys the available technologies and approaches within a given area and becomes very knowledgeable about the alternatives through online and offline research, conferences, and vendor presentations.
While architects definitely spend time doing research, the fundamental difference between a researcher and an architect is that the architect decides. Researchers provide an essential function, but unless they apply the outcome of their research to a specific situation and ultimately make a specific recommendation as a result, they are not acting in an architectural role. He or she produces a list of pros and cons for the various alternatives, in the context of the current business or technical problem.
Evaluation is also an activity that architects sometimes perform and are even more frequently called on to organize.
0コメント